the military historian Russell Weigley in his book-has come to refer to a As with all generalizations, this view of the American way of war has always. Weigley’s analyses and interpretations are searching, competent, and useful. The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy. Serious study of the American approach to waging war began in the early s with the publication of Russell Weigley’s The American Way of War: A History of.
|Published (Last):||13 January 2010|
|PDF File Size:||13.29 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.96 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
He posited that a decisive change from a strategy of attrition to one of annihilation occurred during the Civil War.
A Better American Way of War
Generally unchallenged for many years, Weigley’s thesis has recently been criticized by some military historians for blurring the amerlcan dichotomy, for being more applicable to certain wars than others, and for failing to allow for strategic improvisation and evolution during the course of a conflict.
If thd originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. View the discussion thread. Following the Civil War, Weigley concluded, we grew addicted to a style of conflict that demanded massive resources, overwhelming force, superior technology, a dash of hubris and decisive, complete victory.
Some scholars have focused on the importance of the U. With much oversimplification, this essay attempts a broad categorization of four of the more prominent interpretations of the American Way of War advanced by either military historians or by analysts who make extensive use of history.
Without cookies your experience may not be seamless. In the past few years scholars have proposed a number of alternative explanations for the American Way of War. That prompted another round of soul-searching. You do not currently have access to this article. Don’t already have an Oxford Academic account? View freely available titles: To purchase short term warr, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. Close mobile search off Article navigation.
Project MUSE Mission Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. The following is by no means a complete list, but it does provide a sampling of some of the approaches. Thereafter, and in some cases regardless of political objectives, American military leaders attempted to shatter the enemy’s military forces on the battlefield.
Mahnken’s Technology and the American Way of War since Columbia University Press, explores how the services have adopted and employed those weapons that best suit their institutional prerogatives. Most users should sign in with their email address.
This caveat aside, the categories may serve as a starting point for further discussion on the American Way of War debate. Gaffney, or others—is a vibrant and evolving discussion about current and future U.
The American Way of War
In part, America still exists because it has not been completely stupid in how it uses military force. Army counterinsurgency operations and doctrine provides the best overview of the “alternative” way of unconventional war.
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Built on the Johns Hopkins University Campus. Citing articles via Google Scholar. Sign In or Create an Account.
Then the Pentagon struck out in the postwar occupation of Iraq and bogged amsrican in Afghanistan.